FREE CONSULTATON

© Copyright 2026, Cory Wilson Criminal Defence. All Rights Reserved.

No mystery, no sales pitch. 
Here is exactly what happens from the moment you call.

A SIMPLE, REPEATABLE PROCESS
REFINED ACROSS 1,500+ CASES.

When you call, you get me, not a junior lawyer. We go over what happened, what you've been charged with, and when your first court date is.
 
By the end of the call you'll know what you're facing, what your options are, and what it would take to fight it. The call is free and you don't owe me anything after it.

FREE CONSULTATION

01

Once I have the Crown's disclosure, I go through all of it: the police reports, witness statements, video, and any statement you gave.
 
I'm looking for where the case against you doesn't hold together, whether that's a Charter breach, a gap in the evidence, or a witness whose story has changed. Then I build the defence around it.

DEFENCE STRATEGY

02

Some cases end early, with charges withdrawn, a peace bond, or Alternative Measures, because the Crown sees the problems in its file before a judge does. Others go to trial.
 
Either way, I handle it from start to finish. If it goes to trial, I'm the one cross-examining the witnesses.

RESOLUTION OR TRIAL

03

A SIMPLE, REPEATABLE PROCESS REFINED ACROSS 1,500+ CASES.

👋 Legal Marketing by Inbound Legal

CRIMINAL DEFENCE LAWYER
SERVING CALGARY

AVAILABLE 24/7

FREE. CONFIDENTIAL. CALL NOW.

Call Now: 403-917-1061Get A Free Consultation

REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION

Work directly with Cory Wilson, not a junior lawyer.

Get a strategy specific to your circumstances.

Review your options for fighting the charge.

LOCAL. PROVEN. 
HANDS-ON.

OVER 16 YEARS OF 
DEFENCE EXPERIENCE

AVAILABLE 24/7 
FOR FREE CONSULTATIONS

+1,500 CASES 
DEFENDED

130+ FIVE STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS

SPEAK TO CORY WILSON, FREE.

Get in touch using the form below.

If you have been charged, call Cory immediately. He will discuss your options in a free consultation.

+1,500 
CASES

TRUST A TOP-RATED CALGARY CRIMINAL DEFENCE LAWYER

+130
REVIEWS

DON'T LET A CRIMINAL CHARGE RUIN YOUR LIFE!

TRUST A TOP-RATED
CALGARY CRIMINAL DEFENCE LAWYER

"Our family never thought we’d be in such a perilous situation. Cory Wilson was professional, sympathetic and kind to our family, guiding us through every step of the way. From instruction in dealing with the authorities, ensuring our case was heard by the Courts in a timely manner, negotiating with the Courts, and answering questions; Cory was there for us."
J.J.
"Best Criminal lawyer in Calgary. Cory Wilson took great care of our son and made sure he didn't get a criminal record. Cory was very approachable and always returned our endless emails and phone calls."
R.Y.
"To say Cory is on top of his game would not be doing justice to his ability to represent me and clear my name from the charges I faced. I met Cory when he was recommended to me by as someone who was more than capable of dealing with my issues. From the outset, I was impressed by his demeanor and honesty with regards to the jeopardy I faced."
M.M.
"I was wrongfully accused of a crime I didn’t commit.  I was referred to Mr. Cory Wilson as a defence lawyer &, thank God, am I ever glad he was my defence lawyer and by my side in my case.  He listened to all my evidence, protected my legal rights all the way to the end and always acted in my best interest.  He was always there when I needed him.  Most importantly, Mr. Wilson believed in my innocence and that is what mattered to me the most."
E.A.
"I made a stupid mistake one night and was charged with impaired driving. I blew way over the legal limit and thought I had no option but to plead guilty. My friend recommended Cory Wilson because he got him off a couple charges. After I met with Cory, he explained that just because I blew over the limit, didn’t mean they could prove the case against me. We went to trial and after Cory cross-examined the cop, the prosecutor pulled the case and I won. I needed my license for my job and because of Cory, I am still working."
A.B.
Best Criminal lawyer in Calgary. Cory Wilson took great care of our son and made sure he didn’t get a criminal record. Cory was very approachable and always returned our endless emails and phone calls.
R.Y.
CORY WILSON 
CRIMINAL DEFENCE LAWYER
Cory Wilson has practiced criminal defence in Calgary for 16 years and has appeared at every level of court in Alberta. 

He has been counsel on homicides, kidnappings, major drug seizures, sexual offences, and the largest fraud in Canadian history, and he defends the charges that fill most of a criminal docket: assault, domestic assault, theft, fraud, drug possession, firearms, and impaired driving.
 
His approach is the same on every file: read all of the disclosure, find where the Crown's case is weak, and press on it, whether that means a Charter application, a cross-examination that changes a witness's story, or a call to the prosecutor that ends the case before trial.

 
Cory earned his J.D. at the University of Calgary, articled at Bennett Jones LLP, and spent his early criminal career working alongside Willie deWit, K.C., now a judge of the Alberta Court of Appeal, and Hersh Wolch, K.C., one of Canada's most respected criminal lawyers.

ASSOCIATIONS
CORY IN THE MEDIA

PROTECT YOUR FREEDOM

PROTECT YOUR RECORD

PROTECT YOUR CAREER

"Best Criminal lawyer in Calgary..."
R.Y.
FREE CONSULTATON
CRIMINAL DEFENCE SERVICES
A criminal charge puts your record, your job, and in some cases your freedom on the line. I've spent 16 years defending people in Calgary against charges ranging from shoplifting to murder. Whatever you've been charged with, the approach is the same: I read every page of the disclosure, find where the Crown's case is weak, and build the defence around it.

If you have been charged with one of the following offences, I can help.

A criminal impaired driving charge means a criminal record, a driving prohibition, and consequences that follow you into job applications and border crossings. I've won these at trial by cross-examining officers on their grounds to arrest and by getting breath evidence excluded under the Charter.

IMPAIRED DRIVING / DUI / IRS

DRUG POSSESSION

The line between simple possession and possession for the purpose of trafficking is mostly quantity, and the sentencing gap between them is enormous. Drug cases almost always start with a search, and an unlawful search can end the case.

SEXUAL OFFENCES

Sexual offence allegations carry the heaviest consequences short of homicide: long sentences, registration on the sex offender registry, and a record that never goes away. These cases usually come down to credibility, and I have had charges dismissed by cross-examining complainants on the inconsistencies in their accounts.

ASSAULT

Assault is any intentional application of force without consent, from a shove to a serious injury. Many assault charges come out of arguments where both people were involved and only one was charged. Self-defence and the credibility of the complainant are usually where these cases are won.

GET A FREE CONSULTATION

FIREARMS CRIMES

Firearms offences under the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act carry long sentences, some with mandatory minimums, and they are usually stacked on top of other charges. How police found the firearm matters as much as the firearm itself.

Domestic assault is charged under the same section as any assault, but it is treated differently at every stage: no-contact conditions that can keep you out of your own home, a Crown policy that makes withdrawal harder, and tougher sentencing. Most of these cases turn on the complainant's account, and that is where I focus.

DOMESTIC ASSAULT

FRAUD

Fraud runs from switching a price tag to a Ponzi scheme, and sentences run just as wide. The Crown has to prove deceit, not just that money moved, and in a document-heavy case there are usually gaps in that proof. I was counsel on the largest fraud prosecution in Canadian history.

Theft under $5,000 is one of the most common charges in Calgary courts, and for a first offence there are usually ways to resolve it without a criminal record, including Alternative Measures. The goal is to get you out with your record clean, and that is what the S.V. case below shows.

THEFT

SOME OF CORY'S SUCCESSFUL CASES
S.V. was charged with theft under $5,000 after being caught shoplifting several pairs of sunglasses. She was caught red-handed and gave a full confession when confronted. She was a mother of two children and her employment required a clean criminal background. 

Cory was able to have S.V. entered into the Alternative Measures Program on her first court appearance. After she successfully completed a small amount of community service, the charges were withdrawn.
THEFT
Charges Withdrawn
B.S. and his younger brother were accused of sexually assaulting their younger sister for approximately 5 years in the 1970s. The allegations were made in 2015 after the complainant had been estranged from the family for decades. If convicted, B.S. was facing a lengthy jail sentence. B.S. and his brother unequivocally denied the charges and pled not guilty. Cory cross-examined the complainant on her ever-changing versions of events and provable fabrications. 

At the conclusion of cross-examination, the Crown Prosecutor asked the judge to dismiss all of the charges against B.S. and his brother.
SEXUAL ASSAULT
Charges Dismissed
N.S. was charged with 13 offences including possession of illicit substances for the purposes of trafficking. He was also charged with two counts of possession of a firearm while prohibited, possession of a stolen firearm, careless storage of a firearm and proceeds of crime. At trial, Cory established that the officer who interviewed N.S. shortly after his arrest had falsely told him his fingerprints were found on the gun case.


N.S. was found not guilty on all charges.

DRUG POSSESSION
Not Guilty
A.G. was accused of assaulting his wife and teenage son and of breaching both a recognizance and a protection order. The allegations were made during an ongoing matrimonial and custody dispute between A.G. and his estranged wife.


A.G. was set to have three trials over the course of two weeks. Cory Wilson was able to have each charge withdrawn and A.G. did not face trial for any of the alleged offences.

ASSAULT
Charges Withdrawn
M.M. was accused by his pregnant fiancée of assaulting her three times in one evening, once in front of her young child. The complainant and M.M. had a very tumultuous relationship with significant issues of infidelity. On the evening of the incident, the complainant alleged that after a verbal argument, M.M. chased her outside and threw her to the ground. After the complainant returned to the house, M.M. physically restrained her, pushed her, twisted her arm behind her back, punched her, choked her, threw her to the ground and pinned her down.


At trial, Cory extensively cross-examined the complainant on the multiple inconsistent statements she gave to police. 

The trial judge found M.M. not guilty. This was the best possible outcome for the client.

ASSAULT
Not Guilty
C.C. was charged with aggravated assault after a child in her day home suffered a serious head injury. C.C. was detained and interviewed by police for over 8 hours. During this time, she asserted her right to silence on 24 occasions. The interviewing police officer used the Reid Technique, an interrogation method designed to extract confessions. At the end of the interview, C.C. confessed to throwing the child to the ground, causing him significant injury. 

Cory provided the trial judge with extensive written submissions detailing the significant issues with the officer’s use of the Reid Technique.

The judge, in a blistering decision, denounced the use of the Reid Technique in the strongest terms and found that C.C. did not confess on her own free will.
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
Charges Withdrawn
R.A. was charged with impaired driving and driving over 0.08 after police observed his vehicle swerving between two lanes, hitting the curb multiple times, speeding up and slowing down for no apparent reason and running a red light. He was pulled over and police noted an overwhelming smell of alcohol coming from his mouth, he admitted to consuming beer, had red eyes and slurred his speech. After failing a roadside screening device, he was arrested and brought to the RCMP detachment.

After reviewing the disclosure, it was clear to Cory that the officer breached R.A.’s right to counsel. Cory immediately contacted the Crown who agreed with Cory’s position and withdrew the charges three weeks after R.A. was arrested.

Having charges withdrawn weeks after being charged is the best possible outcome any accused person could hope for.
IMPAIRED DRIVING
Charges Withdrawn
Police received a 9-1-1 call of a possible impaired driver. The offending vehicle being driven by A.B. was located by police and observed to straddle the centre dividing line for several blocks before failing to signal prior to turning. Shortly after police pulled A.B. over, she was arrested for impaired driving and subsequently blew over the legal limit.

At trial, Cory cross-examined the arresting officer on her grounds to arrest. The officer testified to a significant number of indicia that would support A.B.’s arrest. During cross-examination, Cory played the in-car video that the officer clearly didn’t know existed. After a lengthy cross-examination, the officer conceded she was mistaken about most of the indicia that she had previously testified as being present.

Cory argued that the officer breached A.B.’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The trial judge agreed with Cory and excluded the breath certificate. A.B. was found not guilty of all charges.

IMPAIRED DRIVING
Not Guilty
Police were called to the scene of a minor car accident that occurred inside a parking lot. Upon arrival at the scene, police walked directly to J.B. who was standing on the sidewalk adjacent to the parking lot. Police questioned J.B. as to his level of sobriety and where he had been earlier in the day. At the conclusion of the brief conversation, J.B. was read a roadside breath demand. J.B. failed and was arrested for impaired driving.

At trial, Cory cross-examined the officer as to his grounds to demand a roadside sample of breath. During cross-examination, the officer conceded he did not inquire if J.B. was the driver of the vehicle or when the driving occurred, both of which are conditions required to form the necessary grounds.

After Cory’s cross-examination, the trial judge said that there was no need for either lawyer to make an argument as it was clear the officer did not have grounds to arrest. A.B. was found not guilty.

A verdict of not guilty was the best possible outcome.
IMPAIRED DRIVING
Not Guilty

CRIMINAL DEFENCE LAWYER
SERVING CALGARY

AVAILABLE 24/7

FREE. CONFIDENTIAL. CALL NOW.